YOU HAVE A GOD-GIVEN, FUNDAMENTAL, EQUAL RIGHT TO BE A PARENT, UNLESS YOU'VE BEEN TRIED IN CRIMINAL COURT AND FOUND TO BE UNFIT BY A JURY, FOR SOME CRIME SUCH AS CHILD ABUSE, NEGLECT, ABANDONMENT THAT INVOLVED HARM TO A CHILD.

THERE'S NO NEED TO REINVENT THE WHEEL BY SEEKING MORE LEGISLATION. WE NEED TO REPEAL UNCONSTITUTIONAL FEDERAL AND STATE STATUTES.

THE PROBLEMS ARE:

1) FEDERAL FUNDING REWARDS STATES FOR DESTROYING FAMILIES.

2) CROOKED JUDGES VIOLATE THEIR OATH TO FOLLOW THEIR STATE CONSTITUTION AND THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, AND YOUR RIGHT TO PARENT.

3) UNCONSTITUTIONAL STATE STATUTES FALSELY "GRANT" JUDGES DISCRETION TO DENY FIT PARENTS THEIR EQUAL RIGHT TO BE A PARENT.

IF YOU'VE BEEN ACCUSED OF A CRIME FOR WHICH YOUR RIGHT TO PARENT IS QUESTIONED, DEMAND YOUR 6TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO A SPEEDY, PUBLIC TRIAL BY JURY IN CRIMINAL COURT. FAMILY COURTS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL KANGAROO COURTS.

THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO BE A PARENT

MUST WATCH: TO UNDERSTAND THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND HOW THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS FAILED TO FOLLOW IT: KRISANNE HALL ON C-SPAN: SOVEREIGN DUTY

MUST WATCH: BOB NORTON'S VIDEO SERIES: LAWLESS FAMILY COURTS - a mini-law school on family courts (61 minutes)

MUST WATCH: RASCIST ROOTS OF STATE MARRIAGE LICENSES

DON'T MAKE THE STATE THE 3RD PARTY TO YOUR MARRIAGE - STAY INDEPENDENT WITH A COMMON LAW MARRIAGE

MUST READ: CITIZENS RULE BOOK & JURY HANDBOOK

----------------------------------------

This site promotes equality and justice for both mothers and fathers.

The name reflects the current treasonous state family court practices generally denying fathers their rights. The best interest of children is for parents to cooperate, which can happen only on a level playing field. Kids need both fit parents to be treated equally. State family courts daily promote destruction of family relationships by ignoring the U.S. Constitution and the constitutional right to be a parent.

EXILED PARENTS: Fit, law-abiding parents denied their constitutional right to maintain or pursue the natural, biological condition of parenthood or whose parenthood has been significantly diminished or interfered with by means of forced, unequal, child custody court orders.

THE FIX:

1) Repeal federal legislation such as CAPTA, ASFA, VAWA, the Bradley Amendment and Title IV-D & E of the Social Security Act and any other acts that promote family destruction,

2) Enforce the FUNDAMENTAL, GOD-GIVEN, NATURAL RIGHT TO PARENT of fit parents, unless they agree otherwise: no parent deemed unfit except upon conviction before a jury of peers, no more unequal custody orders by a single judge,

3) Trial by jury in all cases that involve the Fundamental, Constitutional right to be a parent with standard of proof as beyond a reasonable doubt because denial of parenthood is no less serious than incarceration,

4) State-of-the-art live video streaming and electronic recording of all court proceedings: Cameras and voice-to-text software to automate transcripts in all courtrooms and allow parties to use their own electronic recording equipment in court as check on court recordings. There are cases where records have been altered. See Deconstructing America

5) End the diversion of legal proceedings into witch hunts using court ordered psychological "evaluations" of fit parents. Psychology is not a science and psycholgists are a part of the divorce industry. Search "Psychiatry Exposed". Unless a parent is charged and convicted of a crime in criminal court, equal custody ALREADY EXISTS for separating parents, just as in intact families, and must be enforced unless parents otherwise agree to unequal custody, but the default is always equal custody for fit, willing parents.

If a country is attacked, people will go to war and risk losing even their lives, in addition to their standard of living, because it is a noble cause.

Families are under attack from an enemy within our borders, yet many victims refuse to "enlist" in the war effort for the good of everyone, even after their kids are kidnapped!

Instead they too often concentrate only on their own personal loss and fall into the money trap whereby they help support the enemy - the divorce industry - by hiring an attorney, equating money with love for their kids. This is in effect supplying the enemy, an insane selfishness. Many of us suffered this temporary insanity trying to save our kids.

But if your neighbor's house is burning down, should you not be more concerned for your neighbor's life than damage to your property?

Victims of the divorce industry need to work together to fight terrorism against families here in the U.S. You can be part of a patriotic cause to defend the U.S. Constitution against a renegade family court system which ignores that foundation of our laws.

Our founding fathers provided the means for the PEOPLE to address tyrannical government.

The FIRST AMENDMENT to the U.S. Constitution guarantees free speech, free press and the right of the people peacefully to assemble to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. It is our duty as Americans to honor our founding fathers by following their blueprint.

ALL YOU NEED TO DO:

PLEASE VIDEO RECORD YOUR STORY OF INJUSTICE and post it on You Tube. Start your own You Tube channel. It's easy. Send the video to me to post on my YouTube channel if you like. Or, if you live within 100 miles of Washington, D.C. contact me about recording a video for you.

Mark Young, Arlington, VA

Phone (703)798-7598

E-mail: markyoung12@yahoo.com

My Profile

TELL YOUR STORY TO POST ON YOU TUBE

EXPOSE FAMILY COURTS

MISSION:

I. EXPOSE THE FAMILY DESTRUCTION INDUSTRY

II. LEGISLATION ABOLISHING IT

III. JUSTICE:

A. AGAINST JUDGES WHO ILLEGALLY STOLE CHILDREN FROM FIT PARENTS OR DECREASED PARENTS' ACCESS TO CHILDREN TO LESS THAN EQUAL PARENTING TIME

B. MONETARY REPARATIONS TO PARENTS EXILED FROM THEIR CHILDREN, AND TO CHILDREN EXILED FROM THEIR PARENTS, BY OUTLAW JUDGES

IV. 21ST CENTURY TECHNOLOGY FOR OUR COURTS: LIVE STREAM OVER THE INTERNET ALL COURT HEARINGS AND ALLOW LITIGANTS TO VIDEO RECORD THEIR HEARINGS

V. TRIAL BY JURY IN MATTERS AFFECTING PARENTAL RIGHTS INCLUDING PROTECTIVE ORDER HEARINGS

I. EXPOSING THE DIVORCE INDUSTRY: primarily family court and appelate court judges, and family lawyers, but also psychologists, social workers, child protective services, child support agencies, etc: all those who assist the process of diminishing relationships between fit parents and their children through forced unequal custody orders, or who profit as a result of unequal custody orders.

VIOLATIONS OF CIVIL AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND CRIMES COMMITTED BY FAMILY COURT AND APPELLATE COURT JUDGES:

1) Denial of First Amendment Freedoms of Religion and Speech - Parents cannot train up their children according to their beliefs when stripped of parental authority.

2) Denial of First Amendment Right to Petition for Redress of Grievances - Parents, mostly fathers, are denied justice in family courts and appellate courts - their petitions are denied or dismissed.

3) Kidnapping - State "family" court judges steal children from fit, law-abiding parents, perpetuating custody battles.

4) Denial of Fourth Amendment Right to Privacy - Unsubstantiated accusations result in invasion of homes and stealing of children by police or child protective services without probable cause; judges routinely order psych evals which invade and probe every detail of private family life of law-abiding parents. Parties who come to court to address legal issues are diverted into a wilderness of psychological evaluations because judges refuse to do their job: enforce the constitutional right to parent, further draining family assets.

5) Denial of Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Rights to Due Process of Law - These include: denial of the right to free counsel for poor defendants, denial of the right to take depositions, lack of evidentiary hearings, lack of notice, and improper standard of proof - with defendants being presumed guilty and being sentenced, like criminals, to loss of the fundamental constitutional right to be a parent.

6) Denial of the Sixth Amendment Right to a Speedy, Public Trial by Jury - Questions of parental fitness involve threat of physical harm to a child, for a crime such as child abuse, child neglect or child abandonment. Those accused of these crimes must be tried by a jury as with any other crime, not a single judge. State statutory schemes presume to supersede these rights by presuming to "grant" judges discretion to order unequal custody against fit parents.

7) Denial of the Seventh Amendment Right to Trial by Jury - Heartless, treasonous judges make decisions to sever loving parent/child relationships which no jury would allow, which perpetuates continual litigation and profits for the divorce industry.

8) Denial of Thirteenth Amendment Prohibition Against Slavery and Involuntary Servitude - Usually fathers are enslaved as non-custodial parents and forced to pay extortion (so-called "child support") or risk being thrown into debtors' prison.

9) False Imprisonment - Fathers are typically arrested first in domestic disputes upon mere accusation. Usually fathers are thrown into debtors' prisons when they do not or are unable to comply with the illegal extortion/"child support" orders.

10) Denial of Fourteenth Amendment Right to Equal Protection of the Laws - Mothers initiate most divorces and are "awarded" sole custody in the vast majority of contested cases even though both parents are equally fit and loving parents, resulting in state sanctioned gender discrimination and child abuse - stealing one half of the child's world.

11) Denial of Fourteenth Amendment Liberty Interest in the Family - Numerous U.S. Supreme Court rulings have well-established the fundamental liberty interest in the family and the constitutional right to be a parent. Yet, treasonous state "family" court judges daily and routinely ignore and violate the U.S. Constitution and their own state constitutions, and violate their oath of office to uphold those constitutions.

12) Fraud upon the courts - Judges and lawyers of the multi-billion dollar divorce industry increase the amount of custody and family law litigation in contradiction of its alleged purpose - to strengthen and preserve families, by trampling on the rights of U.S. Citizens.

These so-called professionals routinely commit or assist in fraud upon courts of family law and violate the U.S. Constitution by effectively terminating

WITHOUT ANY COMPELLING STATE INTEREST OR SHOWING OF HARM TO A CHILD,

the natural, biological bonds of affection between children and their fit, law-abiding fathers in most cases, but occasionally those of fit mothers as well, through unequal "custody" orders, under the false pretense of acting "in the best interest of the child". Then, under the false pretense of a created need for so-called "child support" caused by the unequal custody order, the same renegade, tyrannical judges issue extortion ("child support") orders against these fit parents and routinely jail parents who do not or are unable to obey their extortion demands in debtors' prisons = involuntary servitude = slavery, and false imprisonment.

This Orwellian double speak: a perversion of language in which some acts are given names opposite of the true meanings (See George Orwell's book, "1984"), is the foundation of lies upon which families are being destroyed in so-called family courts across the United States.

PRIMARY EXAMPLES:

A. STEALING A CHILD from a fit parent is called the "BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD".

B. EXTORTION against a fit parent, necessary ONLY because of the illegal, unconstitutional, forced unequal custody order, is called "CHILD SUPPORT ".

C. INVASION OF PRIVACY when no crime has been alleged is called a "PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION".

Their primary vehicle to accomplish this is slander. The game they play is to determine a "good parent" and a "bad parent", ie., a "winner" and a "loser", by means of defamation against even the best of loving parents. One parent must be demonized in order to pretend some justification for his being reduced to a new status: "visitor".

By stealing his natural parental status of equal parenthood and denying a level playing field vital for parental cooperation, the outlaw family courts and/or higher courts instigate and promote continual litigation for family lawyers by creating exiled parents desparate to reunite with their children. Exiled parents with assets are duped into spending 10s or 100s of thousands of dollars on attorneys and psychologists.

Psychologists are included in the slander process through court ordered "evaluation" of the psyches of family members, turning legal matters into alleged psychological problems, and defamation of character by these alleged "professionals" who oblige the courts' requests for their services. In my own case, Dr. Thomas Coe of Williamsburg, Virginia was ordered to "evaluate" myself, my ex-wife and our children, but he refused to see me and cancelled my appointment. His EX-PARTE evaluation report was denounced by my evaluator as against American Psychological Association protocol, but that was no problem for the judge, likely a buddy of the "doctor" in this small town, who simply overlooked this "minor" detail.

Legal matters are turned into alleged psychological problems to defame parents and "create" a need for "supervision" by these baby-sitters, perpetuating business for psychologists, social workers, CASA workers (court appointed "special" advocates - volunteer "friends" of the court with no credentials), supervised visitation observers, etc., just as unequal custody orders against fit parents perpetuate the "child support" gestapo bureaucracy which was supposed to go after only deadbeat parents who have not demonstrated care for their children.

Voluntarily choosing psychological counseling may be useful, like exercising the freedom to attend church is useful, but civil court judges should not be routinely ordering psych evals for parents who have not been convicted of a crime any more than they should order someone to attend a particular church.

Psychology is not science. It is similar to religion and some like myself, who have studied psychology and know this, are offended at being diverted to see a psychologist when seeking legal redress from a court of law. Courts are imposing belief systems upon those they order into counseling and delaying administration of justice. Justice delayed is justice denied.

These secular priests - attorneys and psychologists - exact fees in a process like that of one centuries ago when sinners were required to pay indulgences to the church in order to be forgiven their sins and allowed into heaven. Most exiled parents have neither committed nor been convicted of any sin/crime that would legally deny them equal parenthood, yet they are "sentenced" to loss of parenthood and forced to pay extortion, so-called child support.

FASCISM ON THE INCREASE - Just as the fear of terrorist groups, which U.S. foreign policy has helped to both create and strengthen, has lead to abuse of the civil rights of U.S. Citizens by federal government invasions of privacy in the name of "security", overblown fear of the "deadbeat dad" and "wife beater" feeds the abuse of discretion and fascist practices by family court and appelate court judges in the name of defending the "best interests of children". The deadbeat dad is the exception, and domestic violence is committed by both men and women, yet any father defending his rights in family court is treated like a deadbeat and/or wife beater - presumed guilty from the outset in order to pretend justification for divorcing him from his children.

Congress passed the blatanly unconstitutional - based on sex - Violence Against Women Act out of the domestic violence hysteria. Both men and women commit domestic violence, but now men are presumed guilty if a woman makes the slightest allegation against her partner. After a heated argument, a mother can make one phone call and tell one lie, and the police will immediately "rescue" her by removing a father from his family, even before any hearing. If any assault charges are dismissed, the evidence will still be used against him in civil court and he will be "convicted" in civil court and "sentenced" to loss of his parenthood.

The standard of proof for loss of the fundamental right to be a parent should be the same as in criminal court - beyond a reasonble doubt and in front of a jury of one's peers.

Both the military industrial complex and the divorce industrial complex thrive off creation and perpetuation of real or perceived "enemies". Collusion between private industries and government - fascism - is on the increase at the expense of our civil rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, which are increasingly violated by government officials. Foreign wars are profitable for war industries, and war within families is profitable for divorce industries: judges, courts, lawyers, psychologists, social workers, "child support" workers, ie., all those who assist in separating parents who have committed no crime from their children.

Neither war industries nor divorce industries have use for peaceful resolutions.

Family court judges and appellate court judges, and their lawyer buddies have been terrorizing families by terminating or diminishing family relationships for decades. Why do we not fight these terrorists masquerading as judges and officers of the court?

II. LEGISLATION is required to either ABOLISH family courts, or at minimum REPEAL state statutes that presume, UNLAWFULLY, to grant judges discretion for ordering unequal custody between two FIT parents. PARENTS ALREADY HAVE A GOD-GIVEN, INHERENT, FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO BE A PARENT. The U.S. Supreme Court and other U.S. federal courts have upheld the constitutional right to be a parent and the right of children to be raised by their parents absent a compelling state interest to deny the right to be a parent. Family courts and appellate court judges routinely violate the U.S. Constitution with orders which treat law-abiding parents who are similarly situated before the court in an arbitrary and capricious manner, violating the principle of equal protection of the laws.

THE FALLACY OF REFORM

When the LAW OF THE LAND - THE CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS - is followed, parents will no longer be able to pursue or be financially rewarded through forced unequal custody orders. Thus, there will no longer be incentive for leaving or avoiding the biological family condition: man, woman and child.

The current practice of denying equal parenting if one parent objects or if there is tension between the parents goes hand in hand with the blame game of determining a "winner" and a "loser". It grants "pseudo-judicial authority" to the "winner" - the custodial parent, and allows the court to side-step its duty to act as a fair referee or umpire from the outset, thereby perpetuating further litigation.

If neither parent has been convicted of any crime, then both must be viewed as fit parents and treated equally. Parents can only cooperate on a level playing field.

Parents who do not want equal time can agree to less parenting time and only these parents or parents who have not accepted responsibility (deadbeats) should be ordered to pay child support. However, the default position encouraged and promoted by courts should be equal parenting for all parents. This is the only constitutional remedy and the evidence is clear that children need both parents.

As King Solomon showed by threatening to divide the child into two halves, the true parent was proven to be the one willing to sacrifice in order to save the child. (I Kings 3:16-28.) Today, parents MUST BE PROHIBITED from claiming SOLE "ownership" of their children in order to save chldren from separation from the other parent. They should not be able to pursue a FALSE SOLE OWNERSHIP through unequal custody orders, but prompted to cooperate with the child's other parent, ideally within the same household or at least in the same neighborhood, for the sake of the children.

Court orders for forced, unequal custody against fit parents are what drive the divorce industry and destroy families. Judges create and perpetuate never-ending litigation by denying justice from the outset, and desperate, exiled parents respond by throwing money at the problem, into the hands of greedy lawyers and psychologists, in this multi-billion dollar divorce/family destruction industry.

THESE JUDGE IMPOSTORS MUST BE STOPPED. WHEN WILL WE PUT AN END TO THIS INSANITY?

III. JUSTICE
A. All judges found to have violated the civil rights of parents need to be prosecuted, removed from the bench, disbarred, jailed, fined or receive whatever punishments appropriate for their particular offenses or crimes, such as fraud, violations of the civil rights of U.S. Citizens, abuse of discretion and/or other crimes committed against fit, law-abiding parents UNDER COLOR OF LAW. Respect for THE LAW OF THE LAND - THE U.S. CONSTITUTION and BILL OF RIGHTS must be reestablished in our court system to promote rather than destroy family bonds. See U.S. Code Title 42, Sections 1983 and 1985 and U.S. Code Title 18, Section 242.

The standard for denying the right to parent is a compelling state interest to prevent immediate harm to a child. This would be for a charge of some crime such as: child abuse, child neglect, child abandonment, parental alienation (needs to be criminalized) in a SPEEDY, PUBLIC TRIAL BY A JURY, with the standard of proof being BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT, pursuant to the 6th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

B. Monetary reparations must be paid to every parent whose child(ren) have been illegally stolen by a judge, to be determined on a case by case basis, payable by the states to all parents the have been victimized by denial of: due process, equal protection of the laws, and of the liberty interest in the family guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and any other violations listed above.

Nothing can buy back precious family time forever lost and relationships stolen from exiled parents and stolen from children denied the care and affection of their parent who was forcibly exiled away from them by judges who behave in a tyrannical, fascistic manner. But the financial poverty, mental anguish and depression such judges impose on non-custodial parents typically prevents many parents from spending even the meager time alotted to them as "visitors".

Non-custodial parents are often forced to give up the relationship with their child(ren) out of incapacity to afford it, or inability to compete with the parenting time and assets "awarded" to the custodial parent, on an uneven playing field. This poverty is often interpreted by children as indifference, negligence, or lack of love, especially when custodial parents work to further alienate children from the non-custodial parent. The non-custodial parent is not present to defend himself or herself against slanderous, alienating propaganda that children often hear from the custodial parent.

Just as Japanese Americans were repaid for having been exiled within the United States, justice demands repayment to families victimized by tyrannical state court judges.

Thus, money damages must be paid to parents who fought to defend their parenthood or were otherwise illegally denied their rights to parent without any legal justification. Time is money, and lack of money prevents non-custodial parents from maintaining family bonds. Money can help heal relationships of parents forcibly exiled and/or alienated from their children by the state courts. It should be paid to both exiled parents and their exiled children.

IV. VIDEO STREAM ALL COURTROOMS: BRING 21ST CENTURY TECHNOLOGY TO OUR COURTS AND ALLOW LITIGANTS TO VIDEO RECORD THEIR HEARINGS

The technology exists for courts to easily provide you with a copy of the video or audio recording of every hearing. Search "VOICE TO TEXT RECORDER" on Amazon to create a written transcript. We should demand both that courts provide this service and that they allow litigants to use it to reduce costs and the need for appeals. Transcripts from private court reporters are very expensive. By helping to keep people honest, electronic recording reduces the need for further litigation or appeals which require expensive transcripts of hearings.

From a parent's perspective, manual court reporting transcripts without video or audio content are obsolete because they do not record emotional content or body language. Would you video record your kid's birthday, basketball or soccer game, but not the court proceeding that determines his or her destiny? Let's get real! Let's DEMAND video or at least audio recording of OUR hearings!

Transcribers can make mistakes and leave out or alter important testimony. Electronic recording provides 100% accuracy and emotional content. WATCH: DECONSTRUCTING AMERICA to learn about alterted court records.And learn about the case of Eugene Wzorek and his fight to obtain tape recordings exposing altered transcripts.

Should not the People, and not judges, decide how to monitor what goes on inside The Peoples' courtrooms? Some jurisdictions provide copies of audio or video already. This keeps light in the courtroom, the best disinfectant to prevent contamination by dishonesty that prevails with secretive hearings, thus reducing the need for expensive transcripts.

It is outrageous that cameras are not already streaming all courtrooms live on the Internet. DEMAND IT! Only electronic recording will keep judges and lawyers honest. Judges work for us. We have a right to monitor their performance in OUR courtrooms. Demand competence. But don't expect honesty without electronic surveillance of judges and attorneys.

If cameras and live streaming were required in all courts, the divorce industry would die! We must demand cameras in the courtrooms when our children's lives are at stake!!! The fact that this is not already common practice demonstrates the blatant fascism - secretive legal proceedings designed to prolong litigation to maximize profits for lawyers, psychologists, court reporters, and the rest of family destruction industry and bureaucracy. Fascism = colusion between government and private industry..

However, even more VITAL is the NECESSITY that all litigants demand use of their own recording device whether or not the courts electronically record, as a check to verify accuracy of any other recording or transcript.

There is a simple technological solution to resolve any appearance of conflict for court reporting in the 21st Century: Allow court reporters or parties to bring in a laptop computer in order to transfer the audio file from the hearing to compact disks (read only), so that all interested parties to the case, and the court, may be provided identical copies of the audio before anyone leaves the courtroom. These copies can be stamped by the court for certification. This removes any suspicion that anyone can alter a record of the proceeding. Any transcript produced, even by a party, can be checked against the audio by any other party.

IT IS ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL that you file a WRITTEN MOTION TO RECORD ALL HEARINGS well ahead of the hearing date. If you wait until you are in court and orally request use of your 1) camcorder with video, 2) camcorder for audio only (some have excellent audio recording quality) or 3) digital voice recorder, your oral motion will most likely be denied because the court's denial will not be on record. You must file a written motion ahead of time FOR YOUR RECORD FILE in case the motion is denied, so that the denial is ON RECORD. Courts wish to avoid any such appearance of unfairness, so they should grant your written motion to record.

For Virginia, here's the STATUTE on ELECTRONIC RECORDING of YOUR hearing (VA Code 17.1-128), which states: "by order entered of record", meaning you must file a written motion before your hearing in order to get permission in writing. If they deny your motion, show them the statute. If they still deny it, get that denial IN WRITING for your record file. It is blatant evidence of unfairness and prejudice against you in not allowing you to get a 100% accurate record for a transcript of YOUR HEARING, using 21st Century technology, in case you need to appeal.

Yes, it is absurd that you have to file a written motion to electronically record YOUR OWN HEARING. ALL COURT HEARINGS SHOULD BE ON RECORD. BUT THEY ARE NOT. THEREFORE, YOU HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT YOUR HEARING IS ELECTRONICALLY RECORDED BY JUMPING THROUGH THEIR HOOPS. They would prefer to keep light out of the courtroom so they can ignore your rights and the U.S. Constitution.

SEE SAMPLE MOTION TO RECORD ALL HEARINGS. Search: Digital Voice Recorder, try to get one that includes Dragon Naturally Speaking voice-to-text software. Olympus make good, inexpensive recorders. with which you can produce your own transcript. But you may have to buy the voice-to-text software separately. SEE ALSO: GENERAL ADVICE TO VICTIMS Below.

V. TRIAL BY JURY IN CUSTODY AND DIVORCE MATTERS

Why should a single judge, who is an attorney and friends with other attorneys, and likely a friend to the attorney seeking to steal your child from you, be allowed to force termination of your God-given, naturally equal parenthood. A jury of your peers would be very unlikely to deny your parenthood or to deny your child his or her parent.

Lawyers and judges like to play god and unfortunately, like to prolong litigation. It is not their financial interest to provide peaceful resolutions. The divorce industry is based on first stealing children from fit parents in order to make you a visitor and enslave you with an extortion (so-called "child support") order.

Jurys are used in criminal matters to relieve judges of the burden and responsibility for imposing severe penalties on defendants. Is severing a parent's bond with a child any less severe a punishment than sending him or her to prison?

Yet they daily steal children from FIT parents. Why do we allow judges to abuse children by removing one half of a child's world: one of the child's parents? This trivializes children and uses them as pawns in a game which perpetuates business for the divorce industry. This is nothing but human trafficking under color of law, with imposter judges acting as slave masters and slave traders.

Family court judge imposters have demonstrated that they prefer to ignore the requirements of due process, equal protection of the laws, and the fundamental right to be a parent under the U.S. Constitution. They prefer to promote and prolong litigation rather than to administer justice.

Our founding fathers knew the importance of trial by jury rather than by a single judge. That is why they included the right to trial by jury in the Sixth and Seventh Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, part of the Bill of Rights (The First Ten Amendments).

Somehow we've been brainwashed in sheepishly submitting to trial by a single judge. Jury trials cost the taxpayers more money and take more time. But the blatant TREASON by imposter judges who ignore the U.S. Constitution by denying fit parents their God-given, Fundamental right to pursue happiness and raise their children already costs taxpayers 10s of billions of dollars per year by creating fatherless children.

What's it going to be: We, the People, or a continuation of We, The Sheeple? Are you going to act like a sheep? Don't let it happen. Only when enough people demand their rights and file written motions for 1) electronic recording and 2) trial by jury, will public pressure allow WE THE PEOPLE to take back our court systems.

GENERAL ADVICE TO VICTIMS: HOW TO HELP END THE DIVORCE INDUSTRY

1. SUBMIT A WRITTEN MOTION - well in advance of your court date - to 1) VIDEO RECORD OR AUDIO RECORD ALL HEARINGS. DEMAND ANY DENIAL OF YOUR REQUEST IN WRITING. Courts wish to avoid any appearance of unfairness, therefore you must get your WRITTEN motions into your record file so that if they do deny your motion, their denial is on record. You can then publicize their denial of basic fairness and their preference for secretive hearings and use this fact on appeal.

If you wait until you are in the courtroom to make a verbal motion, it will likely be denied and you will have no proof that you actually motioned the court. I've seen this happen. Judges know when they are being recorded and many act differently when not being electronically recorded. One judge asked "Why do you want to record?" The question is, why would you not want to electronically record? Why would you want a secretive hearing in a public court of law? Why risk missing errors of the court that can and do ruin peoples lives and then have no record of that error? That's insane!

The purpose of a court hearing is to get the facts and evidence on record according to lawful procedure. So when a court intentionally acts or fails to act in a manner not supportive of 21st Century technology that accurately and inexpensively records the hearing, that is blatant evidence of corruption and that they are more interested in creating and perpetuating further litigation than in justice from the get go.

If you still use an attorney, and he or she objects to electronic recording, this is a clear sign that your attorney is more concerned about not pissing off the judge than pursuing your right to utilize state of the art technology that keeps people honest and produces a 100% accurate record of YOUR hearing. I would fire such a coward.

It is YOUR hearing. Its up to you to know your rights and demand common sensical, basic fairness.

Even if a court provides its own electronic recording you must demand use of your own electronic device as a check on the court's version. There are reports of courts altering, deleting or "losing" parts of recordings. They could claim computer error also. WATCH: DECONSTRUCTING AMERICA to learn about alterted court records.

See Sample Motion To Record All Hearings.

If the court refuses to allow electronic recording, consider civil disobedience by remaining silent in the courtroom until they allow it. If I had a choice between free representation by some famous attorney or electronic recording, I'd choose the latter, no questions asked. Without electronic recording there is no 100% accurate record of the proceeding including non-verbal communication of emotion. We must continue to push for video recording but accept no less than audio recording of OUR HEARINGS.

Recording your own hearing can save 100s or 1000s of dollars. Voice recognition software makes transcription possible even if you cannot type. Find a decent digital recorder with USB connectivity to upload audio files to your computer. Some Sony digital recorders even come with Dragon Naturally Speaking software. See Philips DVT2700 Digital Voice Recorder or Just do a Google search for 'voice recorder with voice recognition'.

Search your state's code website using terms like "court reporter" "electronic recording" etc., to see what the law on electronic recording is in your state. Some courts may require that someone besides yourself be the court reporter. If so, you should find someone to become a court reporter using a digital recording device and voice-to-text software. I have done this by simply becoming a notary, registering a trade name with the business office, then registering with the circuit court clerk by signing their court reporter log book. But again, we should demand use of our own recording equipment as described above under RECORD YOUR OWN HEARING because it is less expensive.

If you have more info on voice-to-text technology or software please let me know.

2. DEMAND TRIAL BY JURY Only when enough people demand jury trials will this foundation of justice be restored. Check with the court clerk to see if they provide a jury demand form, get one from the local law library, or if you have to, make one up. As long as it is written and you are representing yourself in propia persona ('pro per' for short), preferable to pro se, the court should grant your motions. Of course, they may deny the jury demand simply from habit. But you must file the written motion if there's to be any chance for it being granted. If they do deny your jury demand, you will have that in your file and you can then publicize their denial of your right to a jury trial, or bring it up on appeal.

3. IF POSSIBLE, DON'T SUPPORT THE ENEMY: DON'T HIRE A LAWYER AND THEREBY POUR GASOLINE ($$$$$$) ON THE DIVORCE INDUSTRY FIRE. If you must do so, make sure the attorney has a reputation for supporting equal parenting. Do not hire an attorney who ever pursues unequal custody "awards" against fit parents. If no crime is involved by either parent, neither parent and no court has a legal right to deny your right to be a parent. Any decent lawyer will tell you this. The "winner and loser" game divorce attorneys play is a multi-billion dollar industry. Why play that game?

4. GET INVOLVED IN FIGHTING THE WAR AGAINST FATHERHOOD INSTEAD OF GETTING BOGGED DOWN IN YOUR OWN CASE, IF AT ALL POSSIBLE. Your own kids will understand someday. GOD will understand now. Until you help fight the war, you are going to be a loser because the so-called "courts of law" are a sham and a corrupt abomination to the concept of equality and justice!

This is the patriotic duty of every victim of the divorce industry. Losing your children makes you crazy, like a drowning man grasping for anything in sight. I went through three attorneys with the little money I had before I realized it made absolutely no difference whether or not I had an attorney to hold my hand or not. They will tell you anything before you pay them. After you pay them, it really does not matter if they win or lose your case. They get paid no matter what the outcome.

I was one of those people until I realized my call was just to fight the war and let my kids do without me, and hope they would understand when they grow up. Now, they are adults and are apparently understanding somewhat after years of being brainwashed and alienated against me by their mother.

So, my point is, I am sorry only for the money I wasted on attorneys in my desperation early in my case. Instead, I should have demanded electronic recording of my court proceedings. I am glad I fought the good fight representing myself, even though I had no significant victories and did not get to raise my kids. We have to play the hand we are dealt in life. If we care about our kids and their future families, we should fix the problem NOW for all families to end this sad era in America.

The divorce industry is counting on your desperation to motivate you to pay into their evil money making machine. Don't fall into their trap trying to rescue your kids by hiring an attorney. You have a right to represent yourself, though court clerks and others may tell you to hire one. Your tax dollars pay for the courts. If the courts don't play by the rules, refuse to participate in any proceeding. Just sit there in silence until they act like a real court of law and respect your rights that so many men and women have died for. The worst that will happen to you is perhaps spending some time in jail. Are your kids worth that risk? I spent a total of nine months in jail on several occasions over a 12 year period for civil disobedience to ILLEGAL court orders. Of course, they called it "failure to pay child support".

Demand justice! Educate yourself. Don't forget you already know what is right and what is wrong. You have a constitutional right to EQUAL PARENTHOOD. DEMAND IT. Don't be intimidated into playing the devil's game his way. If you pay into the system you are its dupe, a sucker. Stand up for your children and for God's institution - the family. Take back the courts which are under siege by black-robed fascist pigs. Know your rights. Its never too late to start even if you've already paid thousands into the divorce industry. It's never too late to repent and change your ways.

ITS NOT WHETHER YOU WIN OR LOSE, ITS HOW YOU PLAY THE GAME that counts. I thank my parents for teaching me that. If you care only about winning your own case and submit to paying 10s or 100s of thousands to attorneys and/or psychologist, etc. you are ignoring your duty as a citizen and helping to perpetuate the current system designed to exploit your desperation.

Jesus said, "Take heed, and beware of covetousness: for a man's life consists not in the abundance of the things which he possesses." Luke 12:15

FOR EACH AND EVERY HEARING IN ANY COURT:

REMEMBER TO REQUEST/MOTION IN WRITING & GET ANY DENIAL OF A MOTION IN WRITING FOR THE FOLLOWING:

1) VIDEO, OR AT A MINIMUM AUDIO RECORDING OF ALL COURT PROCEEDINGS SEE SAMPLE MOTION TO RECORD ALL HEARINGS.

2) TRIAL BY JURY - DEMAND IT, for YOUR case record file IN WRITING. If you don't demand it, you won't get it, and you are saying it is okay for a judge to deny your constitutional right to a jury and that you think it is okay for a judge, rather than a jury of your peers, to decide whether you can keep your kids. If you are a man, you have almost no chance that a judge-slavemaster will decide in your favor.

AND, KNOW YOUR RIGHTS, Read what the U.S. Supreme Court and other federal courts have ruled about: THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO BE A PARENT

Many judges are white collared child-abusers, black-robed kidnappers, extortioners or bribe takers presiding over injustice towards American families who perpetuate continual litigation revenues for themselves, their lawyer friends and the rest of the divorce industry.

Watch CBS/48 Hours videos of divorce judge caught on camera in ex parte (secret) meeting. (Video Link may no longer exist. Try a web search.)

WATCH ATTORNEYS WHO HAVE BEEN DISBARRED for speaking out against court corruption and altered court records: "Deconstructing America"- VIDEO Part 1 - VIDEO Part 2

"Woe to those who make unjust laws, to those who issue oppressive decrees, to deprive the poor of their rights and withhold justice from the oppressed of my people..." Isaiah 10:1,2

The songs linked on this site are free for non-commercial use only, otherwise by permission.

E-mail: markyoung12@yahoo.com

markyoung12@proton.me

Phone: (703)798-7598